Saturday, August 28, 2004

God hates it when you get up late

And so, this morning, I got up at just past eleven o’clock and tottered down to teh kitchen in search of the coffee–jar. The post title comes from a wonderful article which reviews Tom Hodgkinson’s How To Be Idle, a book which apparently rhapsodizes on the virtues and really concrete benefits thereof. And, even more encouragingly for me, I’m told, Dr. Johnson once said: “Whoever thinks of going to bed before 12 o’clock is a scoundrel.” But this book doesn’t just deal with blank idleness. It deals with the virtues of sexual idleness, mental idleness (absolutely not to be confused with mental inactivity), etc.

Anyway, another thing about God — or god, to be properly agnostic about it — is that the belief system in this particular being will drive people to believe the strangest things, whatever their religion. And that, argues the writer of another book, is very very dangerous. The thrust of the book, which is ferocious as far as I can tell from the review, is that religion is the only thought system which takes pride in stubbornly refusing to update itself at all, even though it was only perfectly relevant to its own social world about 3000 years ago.

Therefore, since the 21st century is hemmed in by violent politics, catastrophic threats to the environment and our future potential to survive, massively destructive weapons etc., religion by itself is revealed as nonsense when it tries to deal with any of this. And that alone makes its closest adherents – people who believe firmly in what they say – actively dangerous. About as dangerous, he seems to suggest, as a flame in a cavernous petrol–tank. I won’t go into any theorising about 9/11 but I think the author of the book itself does.

The Daily Telegraph has a list of phrases by book reviewers. Phrases that should be banned from articles about books. The list includes: emotional rollercoaster, epic — as if synonymous with “long”, event — “a new epic by Homer is always an event”, heady mix, in his inimitable style — incidentally, inimitable people often turn out to be quite imitable: “the inimitable Sean Connery”, lightness of touch, searing indictment, unputdownable.

What puzzles me is why, in these relativistic times where one thing is supposedly as good as another, reviewers are not taken to task for using this language of ultimate praise. Not that they should be, of course. In books, just as in music or any other art, one thing is rarely as satisfying as another.

Thursday, August 26, 2004

Undercity

New York’s tube map has undergone a significant revision and Gothamist has the lowdown on it. Here at peripathetic, I’ve posted about newer versions of London’s tube before, and with fond memories. But I can’t imagine how difficult it would be to get used to travelling by subway in New York. Maybe, one day, when Bush has wilted, I’ll get to learn first–hand.

Wednesday, August 25, 2004

Whistle while you walk…

DieselGT, of GTAForums.com, takes a walk, and finds a dropped digicam in the woods! A couple of hundred quid certainly. Takes it home, sees what’s in it.

Posts the results on the net.

Various users’ comments: “Nice finding the camera. Treat it well.” “What the f*ck is that in the fog?” “Reckon that last picture was taken as the camera was dropped? Reckon the reason for it being dropped was because of all of the above?”

Personally, if it was me, I’d drive by the woods and throw the camera out the window in passing. Good riddance. Ugh. [shudder] — Via MetaFilter.

Sunday, August 22, 2004

Armed robbers steal ‘The Scream’

Munch: The Scream

Yep, it’s true. Edvard Munch’s The Scream, and his less well–known Madonna, have been stolen by armed robbers from Oslo’s Munch Museum during opening hours.

I was walking along a path with two friends – the sun was setting – suddenly the sky turned blood red – I paused, feeling exhausted, and leaned on the fence – there was blood and tongues of fire above the blue–black fjord and the city – my friends walked on, and I stood there trembling with anxiety – and I sensed an infinite scream passing through nature.
—Edvard Munch

This isn’t the first time this has happened, either. The painting is fragile, which, apart from the theft itself, will be the chief worry for investigators. (Its red sky, by the way, was because of the Krakatoa eruption.)

Once upon a time…

…a little doggy poo lived on the side of a road.

The things you find on the net. Via MetaFilter. See also: Rate My Poo, Poo Price (for calculating how much money is involved in you taking a poo break during work), Poo.com (still without an owner), and the Kangaroo Poo clothing store.

Thursday, August 19, 2004

popularity


popularity
Originally uploaded by peripathetic.

This is a BBC graphic of Bush’s Presidential Inauguration route. But I swear I just looked at it and thought: it’s his popularity ratings graph for now until November. Heh.

Well, I can hope, can’t I?!


Muskrat


muskrat
Originally uploaded by yezbick.

I just saw this cute creature on Flickr. Quite cool.

Even cooler, actually, now that I’ve seen the format of this post, is the way Flickr formats little bitty photoblog posts like this. I like!


Tuesday, August 17, 2004

Strange exhibits

The Soap Lady. A massive colon. Foetal skeletons. Wax exhibits of eye diseases. These are all available for you to look at if you visit Philadelphia.

On the other hand, if you live in the UK, you can go to the Pitt Rivers Museum in Oxford (which hosts a vast collection of general, if not always medical, ephemera) or even better, make an appointment to see the Wellcome Institute’s museum in London.

Actually, blogging about this has awakened memories of a lot of other ‘private’ museums around this country, including unreal, violent little collections laid out as real museums inside police stations, normally for police viewing only… if I remember enough, I’ll blog about them another time.

While you’re reaidng this, it might interest you to know that US police keep *all* evidence from *all* major crime–scenes — at least that’s how it appears. Recently, the Sheriff’s Office which dealt with the school shootings at Columbine laid out a one’day evidence exhibition for relatives and friends of the victims. Apparently everything was there. All the spent shotgun shells, for example. And that’s just the start.

Makes you wonder what else the police hold. The gun which killed Kennedy, for example? And if they throw these things out, where do they go? What happens to them? Could my dinner knife me made out of reconstituted steel from the World Trade Center, someday? And if they keep everything for ever, where does it go? I ask sincerely — it’s interesting and vital. If you know, please say.

Monday, August 16, 2004

Perfect


Taking a look at Coudal recently, I came across this superb recipe. Your Vermouth, sir:

The motions and steps are all ordered to bring everything together at the holiest moment. There are many ways to describe the final product. Clean, precise and transcendent come to mind. But none of it is possible without cold. Cold in all its meanings. Unfeeling. Stoic. Mathematical.

[…] Pour the ice and Club Soda out of the glasses. The Soda enables the trace amount of Vermouth in the drink to cling to the side of the glass surounding the pure slurry of Vodka and imparting a hint of taste with each sip. Trust me.

11. Uncap the shaker and pour the drinks. An occasional back and forth rotation of the shaker will facilitate the process. The final product will be thickish, with a slightly slushy quality.

12. Drop in the olives.

13. Enjoy slowly. Chat about the issues of the day. Smoke.

14. Repeat as necessary.

This reminded me, in its bone–dry warmth and passion for its subject, of a similar recipe by Luis Buñuel, but his was for a Martini, and was inspired to some degree by Thomas Aquinas and virgins’ hymens. If you don’t believe me, go search. ;o)

Sunday, August 15, 2004

Did 9/11 change journalism?

Joho blogs a thoughtful article in Pressthink, which asks, among other questions, what journalists tell themselves about their reporting of the Iraq war, of 9/11, etc. It asks if journalistic ethics today are the same, and whether they are just as adequate as they were before. It asks unanswerable questions and might therefore be a bit of navel–gazing but that’s what most blogs are anyway.

So, to gaze at my own intellectual navel: I think journalistic real–life ethics change from month to month and story to story, regardless of the codes that sit astride them. Their adequacy is only the adequacy of how a human being responds to a particular situation — after all, journalists are human beings, just as militants are. Just as Osama bin Laden is.

I also think Joho was on to something in his post about the article. He points out:

Journalists are always embedded because they are human. We humans are fallible, context–bound and self–interested. Our glory is that we can be less so rather than more so. But, we’re stuck with being bodies born into history.

Therefore, he says, American journalists should (and I’m paraphrasing) reclaim the free press as truly free, and discard the lies of omission and poor focus found in many Iraq articles. They should cite troop hopelessness and well as troop strength. They should be open about Bush’s alleged schizophrenic behaviour. They should knock down the taboos while still retifying their journalistic codes of conduct.

As a result, more terror laws would be carefully considered before being passed or shelved. The public would be forced to think harder about many more issues before going to the polls. Journalists would have to really understand what they were writing about before they started to write. There would be a sense of accountability to an overarching intellectual frankness and transparency. I reckon that would be a good thing.

I think journalists tell themselves that they’re doing a great job of reporting Iraq. They aren’t. And, as for the ridiculous notion that ‘embadded’ journalists are really part of the war because they inform the policy–makers: don’t get confused and confuse one concept with the other.

Journalists are no more part of this war in that very very deep sense than they were part of World War 2. As their presentation of the war to the public gets more censored and insipid, so it appears plausible to think of war as political machinations with a few guns involved — and therefore to think of journalists as able to influence its course.

When a war is shown in all its fullness, as last happened in World War 2, and to a certain extent, Vietnam, it is plain to anyone that journalists of any kind are never part of it. They exist outside, at most, as very well–educated gawpers. When reporting of a war sinks to new depths of laziness and the war appears somehow facile, it’s easy for the public to think that journalists really do have access to the war’s heart, and a part to play within it. Wielding their sharp, glinting pens, they roam across the world on their dashing white printing–presses.

What crap. So, no, 9/11 didn’t change journalism that much. Journalists got more self–important as they got the first war–meat of their careers. Laws of freedom of expression were melted and twisted by the so–called cleansing flame of George “burning” Bush. But journalism itself? Changed?! Heh. Heheh.

Saturday, August 14, 2004

Hurricanes…

in America, while here in Belfast, we have sticky southerly winds and the risk of thunder on Monday.

Elsewhere: in Greece the Olympics have started. As I walked past the living–room last night, the TV showed the new stadium awash with camera–flashes and fireworks. I chose not to sit down, but passed through and went upstairs to my bedroom wondering where I could get hold of any decent photos of Ian Thorpe, Australia’s star swimmer.

Ian Thorpe: photo from BBC

This beautifully curved arm, well–padded with 21–year–old muscle, (*Pete drools*) is Thorpe’s. Not that I'm just after Thorpe: there are plenty of swimmers and gymnasts and rowers to watch. Well, maybe not the rowers.

But seriously, before everyone reading this starts thinking I'm nothing but a perv, I actually think watching gymnasts at almost any standard, and particularly at an Olympic standard — and the same goes for swimmers — is actually compelling and impressive. It's the mixture of grace a power: a very difficult mixture to execute correctly. Whereas the body both seeks to decrease its resistance to water in swimming, and fights it at the same time, in gymnastics the body must look as if it is no longer subject to the natural forces of gravity and average human strength. That’s why watching the events on TV is really the thing to do. Photos never give a good impression of the athletes’ efforts - or their physical presence.

But if anyone does turn up some good photos, let me know! *grin*

And going back to America again, I have learned that people from Utah are called Utahns (which seems a bit of a messy word) by reading this story about the declaration of gay marriages as null and void after California ruled that the Governor was acting illegally in issuing them. You can get legally married in Massachusetts, and in Vermont there are recognised civil unions. I guess Vermont’s welcoming stance would induce a bit of mental relaxation for a lot of gay people, in a way, and it may be all the more reason for me to live in Vermont someday, and do this. Although it’s not really the real reason. I just want to, anyway.

Tuesday, August 10, 2004

Apologies…

COPYRIGHTED IMAGE - Fair Use. Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, in Columbine High School

…for the break in postings; I haven’t been too good at doing anything in the past few days. The weekend was taken up with vegetation, realising that Dad was going away to the Isle of Man for a week, and before all of that, going out to a gay bar in Belfast with a new friend who is in the strange position of knowing quite a lot of people on the scene and at the same time actually being a very nice talkable–to person.

So, we went to this bar. And upstairs in the bar — I’d never sat upstairs there before but it’s very nice with square wood and leather chairs — I experienced some of the old–time atmosphere of sitting in an Aberdeen bar with uni people who I'’d known (seemingly) my whole life. It was just one of those moods. I felt relaxed and at home and in charge. And at the same time reaching out. I thought of Jonathan and wondered why he was missing all this, for example. I thought of Patrick and how, when he next visits, I’ll bring him here.

Anyway. Over the weekend that followed, I spent a lot of time pursuing a really random and quite macabre avenue of web research. The Columbine Massacre - the school shootings in Littleton, Colorado. There are a lot of very informative websites out there. A lot of labyrinthine ones. And a lot of really damn unsettling ones. Here’s a snippet by one of the killers:

I HAVE COME TO ROCK YOUR WORLD
I HAVE COME TO SHAKE YOUR FAITH
ANATHEMATIC ANARCHIST
I HAVE COME TO TAKE MY PLACE

I AM YOUR UNCONSCIOUSNESS
I AM UNRESTRAINED EXCESS
METAMORPHIC RESTLESSNESS
I
I AM YOUR APOCALYPSE
I AM YOUR BELIEF UNWROUGHT
MONOLITHIC JUGGERNAUT
I

This is all the more extremist–sounding and unsettling when you consider that the guy who wrote it was a teenager. Now, as creative writing this is pretty good, powerful, punchy stuff. But taken beside what we now know of how exactly his life was to end, and what lives it was to take with it, it seems to resage what happened and it gives me chills. And even after staring myself bug–eyed at this stuff and all the crime scene reports over the weekend, I still can’t stop myself from thinking: don’t dismiss them as wacko bastards. Because they weren’t.

And then I think of all that flows from that… There’s a poem or ten in here somewhere.

Thursday, August 05, 2004

Women’s classic traits: Listening, welcoming, humility, faithfulness, praise and waiting

The Pope, officiating at a weekly Mass in St Peter’s Square, Oct. 2003. Photo: Massimo Sambucetti, AP

…at least, they would be if you’re the Pope. His Holiness has recently given the nod to an encyclical issued by Cardinal Ratzinger. That makes it official doctrine. Among other points, it states that women should be present in the world of work because they have something unique to contribute — how very generous of the church to say so!

Predictably, more or less every woman who’s not Catholic (and quite a few who are) have gone very red in the face, and not just from the exertion of scrubbing the family crucifix, either. One of them is the redoubtable Germaine Greer, who delivered this withering attack in today’s Guardian:

When it comes to excoriating feminism, tight–lipped Ratzinger, head of the Vatican Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith, once known as the Inquisition, allows himself to babble like an advertising copywriter. The church, run by celibates and pseudo–celibates in their own interest, is declared to be “expert in humanity”, a claim that those of us who endured Catholic schools from the ages of four to 17 would find ludicrous.

Women of reproductive age, aware that in practising contraception they are considered to be living in sin and unfit to receive the blessed sacrament, are staying away from mass. Their children will stay away, too. […]

In June this year, Ratzinger issued “Worthiness to Receive Holy Communion. General Principles”, arguing that support for abortion rights and euthanasia would render a Catholic unworthy of receiving the sacrament. The purpose of this paper, which was originally written in English, was to pressure American bishops into refusing to allow John Kerry to receive communion, thus effectively excommunicating him, and frightening Catholics away from voting for him. […]

Catholic feminists who snatch at the straw of the Pope’s statement that housework should be paid for should remember that Wojtyla cannot imagine a world in which housework is done by anyone but women. His Holiness’s lavatory is cleaned by nuns.

Remember all those games you played when you were a kid, where either you or your friends had to do something you didn’t really want to, to fit into your role for the game? For a while, it was kinda fun, you had a job to do, you were part of what was going on. And then you realised that all you were really doing was being a willing accomplice to being dicked around. I can only hope that the Catholic women who take this seriously at first will very soon feel the same way.

(I wonder if it’s nuns who lift the Pope onto the toilet every night? Oh, the irony. He can’t shit without women to help him. To quote Hamlet: ‘What a falling–off was there!’ Well, we can but hope…)

Saturday, July 31, 2004

Ba Ba Ti Ki Di Do

Sigur Rós - Ba Ba Ti Ki Di Do

A gentle high–pitched chime, somewhere on your left. Another. Filling in the spaces, more join in, forming a gentle tinkling carillon which never quite makes it to perfect tonality. A piano adds an occasional note. A couple of minutes later the carillon fades under its own delicacy, Sigur Rós’ trademark scratches and distortions appearing. Ba. Ballet–shoes plunk on a wooden floor. Ba. Little electronic scramblings, and maybe — Ti. — maybe that might be the carillon again… Ki. And then, everything rests for a few seconds before joining in the final Di. Do. section. It’s only about 20 minutes. To me, it’s lovely and interesting, like a tidesmoothed pebble you keep in your pocket, smooth on one side and sharp on the other. Useless. And even as you hoard it you know it belongs somewhere else.

Read about it, at least. :o)

Tuesday, July 27, 2004

Bush: the Big Reader

In one of the most incisive insights into the mind of the distinctly average reader, it emerged in an AP report that George W Bush is actually reading the Report of the 9-11 Commission.

The president said he was reading the report and found it “interesting. It reads like a mystery, a novel. It’s well written,” Bush said in a brief interview outside his home in Crawford.

The mystery / fiction accolade is well deserved, as obviously, nobody in America knows what happened on 9/11.

Jesus, the irony.

Monday, July 26, 2004

I’d so hoped…

…that this blog wouldn’t become (mostly) about one thing. And maybe, being a blog, that’s enough to make it about one thing: my thoughts and interests. But in any case, I was looking around for interesting stuff to blog about, and at first could really only think of one compelling thing: this site I found a couple of weeks back. And yes, it’s quasi–political and about moral pugilism in America. (I really hope after November, all this will stop so you poor people won’t have to read it.)

A young photography student got really nastily pushed around by local and federal police for doing nothing more than taking photos of a wellknown and picturesque (photos are on the site) park and canal lock gates near his home. He was so frightened and panicked that his instincts — like those of a trapped rabbit in North Carolina which will cause said rabbit to run — caused him to inform as many people as possible. Because thank god, there’s still safety in numbers.

But, even as my heart sank, even as I realised there is nothing worth blogging about out there that I can actually be bothered to search through my history for — bang! Inspiration!

Röyksopp: Melody AM

Röyksopp. Does that mean anything to you? Do you recognise the name? Röyksopp are purveyors — nay, creators — of the finest and most funkily serene music since ‘_____’, a generic teenager from everywhere on the planet, sat in his/her room and dreamt the perfect album in his/her spotty head.

Royksopp is something very special. Thanks to their work with Kings Of Convenience, Those Norwegians, and Drum Island the boys are at the heart of the Nordic funk. Their album twinkles like the Northern Lights, has the warmth of a well–worn Rhodes, and manages to mix up styles like Love Unlimited having a snowball fight with Mad Professor over at Brian Eno’s pad.

Yes, that’s right. ONE album. Just one. And that is pure gold when you consider how their music is adored by so many people. One of my favourite blogs, things magazine, has only just noticed the video of Remind Me. Made entirely of animated and morphing information graphics. It’s worth a look, people. The cover art of the album is also lovely because it’s minimalistic. We have a swirl of sky so perfectly, leather–sofa–in–dream–Scandinavian–home brown that there is no grotesquerie here; the visual signals of evergreen trees; and a typeface which, capitalised, is simple and not shouty. It says “this is just me, really”.

And yes, Röyksopp’s site and the video are the ‘totally worth it’ links of the day. You need look no further. Except maybe at this site, to get an idea of the critical acclaim.

Sunday, July 25, 2004

Homophobic B&B owner defends his rights

A few weeks ago, it emerged that a B&B (Bed and Breakfast, for my American friends) owner in the Scottish Highlands declined to give a gay couple a room in his establishment because they were, well, a bit gay. The Cromasaig guesthouse’s owner, Tom Forrest, sent the couple an email explaining his decision. “We do not have a problem with your personal sexual deviation, that is up to you,” he wrote. “You are welcome to our twin room if you wish, but we will not condone your perversion.”

I saw that story in the Guardian a couple of weeks ago and it stunned me. Not so much because I never expect to hear of behaviour like that in these wonderfully tolerant times. But rather because Forrest was being so openly straight — one might almost say straightforward — in his views. And, aside from the point that by being so open he must obviously be ramming his heterosexuality down quiet gay people’s throats, it is a fact that he is simply standing up for his rights.

He owns a B&B. It’s his property and under current laws it is not illegal for hoteliers to turn anyone away from their accommodation without a booking, whatever the reason.

The story I first read presented the results of journalists’ canvassing of other establishments up and down the country to see what their attitudes were. Aside from the laughable:—

The receptionist at Greystone Cottage, Windermere, in the Lake District, hesitated: “Ummm, I suppose not.” Again with the warm welcome. Then they added something which discombobulated us rather: “The only thing I will say is that we have an 11. 30pm curfew.” A gay–only curfew? Or did they think gays just more likely to stay out late? Impossible to decide.

— there was a positive attitude. A Jersey hotelier who said that he’d love to allow gay couples to stay but that it was against a (fictional) Jersey law was overridden by the region’s PR manager who said: “There’s no law against gay couples sharing rooms. You might get the odd proprietor who is a fascist or a redneck, but there’s not much we can do about that.”

Except, there should be. And not solely for the gay–centric reason that Forrest is being homophobic. Ruaridh Nichol has an article in last week’s Observer extolling the liberating influence of the holiday and, more significantly, the hotel or guesthouse. It’s not to say that gay or straight people will automatically launch into orgies when their suitcases are unpacked — knowing you are away from home and have some freedom is largely psychological in its benefit. Start making moralistic rules for your guests and you take that away. Your building ceases to be holiday accommodation and therefore ceases to be of value.

But Forrest, who is at the centre of the present row, is in a position of strength. As well as upholding his legal rights (which happen to annul the human rights of anyone not straight) he has backing. As the most recent article says:

He has received more than 4,000 emails from every corner of the globe, 400 letters, countless phone calls and the odd financial contribution. Around 98 per cent of the correspondence, he estimates, is in support. He has also appeared on numerous radio shows, including California’s Riverside Radio[.]

He plans to oppose the introduction of a law making a stance like his illegal by standing for the Scottish Parliament himself.

But I reckon the fight should be taken out of his hands altogether. He should be compelled to withdraw all discriminatory practices from his management, or be forced to close the business.

If his position is, eventually, declared illegal, he says he’ll go to jail rather than allow “poofs, sorry, homosexuals, to share a double room in my home”.

Thursday, July 22, 2004

9/11 Commission Report published

The 9/11 Commission's Report comes off the presses - AP photo, Manuel Balce Ceneta

I’ll have to blog about this a bit later when some of the dust settles and I've had a chance to watch the presentation, but as the Commission’s site is currently overloaded, the report is also available via the BBC Website (link is a 7mb PDF).

[Update: the Commission’s website is speeding up slightly and you can download the same PDF from it at this link.]

Wednesday, July 21, 2004

Heard on the tube…

From this site. The site owner says it’s gossip but I’m inclined to think of them as little sonic slivers of experiences rendered light and frothy because we overhear, rather than live, them.

You can’t take part in an foxhunt and then complain afterwards that you didn’t really want to do it.” – there goes one friendship.

I have no fucking interest in how some fucking journalist conquered her alcoholism and made an article out of it.” – I read this story in the Guardian. Actually quite boring. In parts.

Dr Who was not Welsh. He came from Gallifrey.” – superb wit. Of course they were talking about some actor but it doesn’t stop it being giggle–worthy!

I swear she had cum on her face.” – oh, the people we pass on the street.

I’m in the mood for spiritual ascension.” – this wasn’t you, Jonathan, was it?

Can anyone think of a good name for a cult?” – I can but I’m not telling. It’s patented. Heh.

Shitting hell.” – yep.

You’re not ugly, you just have a funny bone structure.” – this would be utterly tragic if the person saying it had a friend who really *did* have malformed bones.

David Beckham wears white socks. Fuck me.” – I keep imagining a cockney guy of about 50 saying this, deadpan, to nobody in particular while reading the paper. And I keep on grinning.

They aren’t rats, they are just very dirty mice.” – it took me ages to notice the mice on the tube, too, but I never thought they were rats.

Everyone is so gay.” – obviously said somewhere between Green Park and Leicester Square, although it’d be funnier heard in, for example, a really hard place like Canning Town.

Your headphones do make you look like a bit of a wanker.” – and cue the end of another friendship, or a fistfight between total strangers.

You won’t catch me riding a cock.” – nor me. Their little feathered backs are too small, and their legs too weak. A saddle would be tricky too. Hehe. ;o)

I’ve seen a lot of young men wearing cowboy hats and I don’t think it’s a good thing.” – aww, sweet old grannies these days!

There’s nothing more beautiful that that smell after it’s been raining.” – I agree.

Everyone nowadays is a pervert. What happened to old–fashioned boring sex?” – I can assure you it’s alive and well and living in Belfast. Grr.

All she did all day was talk about herself. She didn’t ask me a single question.” – said by the person who talks about themselves all day.

Oooh.... my nipples are hard.” – actually, I think this might have been me.

My son earns more fucking money than I do.” – yes but that’s because you’re not a rentboy.

Thursday, July 15, 2004

Derelict London

St Pancras Chambers, London: front elevation

A city exists not in its buildings but in the spaces between them, the interstices between here and unknown, now and past, cleanliness and squalor. When we’re in a great city of any kind, we register the contrasts without realising it, and they make the modern look all the more so; the charming picturesque, and the bland actively depressing.

London has more spaces of this kind than any city I’ve been to. And that’s why it’s so encouraging that people who notice the spaces are using modern technology to ‘preserve’ the old derelictions as images. Fitting, too, because image is what they are. They are the stone negative whose positive print was lost long since. Dying stone footfalls along the wide avenues of urban time…

Seattle Public Library — Redux

Photo copyright Scott Nelson

A few weeks ago I blogged about Seattle’s delicious new library. Now, you can gawp afresh at a lovely new walkthrough, to be found here.

Iraqi women beg to be killed…

…as American soldiers sodomise their children. No, it’s not true. Well, it hasn’t been proved to be true yet, and may never be.

The women were passing messages out saying ‘Please come and kill me, because of what’s happened’ and basically what happened is that those women who were arrested with young boys, children in cases that have been recorded. The boys were sodomized with the cameras rolling. And the worst above all of that is the soundtrack of the boys shrieking that your government has. They are in total terror. It's going to come out.

Like many on the MetaFilter thread, I hope it’s not true. Those of you who have seen Michael Moore’s most recent film will be familiar with military insensitivity in Iraq, and this story, if true, will raise hell. Utter hell. Of course, if it’s true, hell has already been raised, and this reply within the post raises the very good point that Moore also makes: many US soliders are very young and have very little education, and letting young uneducated people carry and shoot weapons on government orders is a bad idea.

But we do it in the UK, too. Because obviously 26–year–olds, say, are too old to be starting off in the Forces.

Marks & Spencer’s modernism attacked

Marks and Spencer, Belfast City Centre: formerly Richardsons Warehouse

The traditionalist chain of supermarkets, beloved by the French and lovingly sneered at by the English, is going to have to close a few of its more modern doors soon. New minimalist stores are apparently decidedly *out* of the basket – at least the M&S basket.

When I was a kid, I used to love Christmastime even more than I do now, and one of the most atmospheric pleasures was being taken by the hand and led, wide–eyed, through the food hall and wine shop of our City Centre branch here in Belfast. We have a lot of former linen warehouses here, gigantic ornate masonry things, and M&S sits inside one of them (pictured above) as if it’s perfectly at home.

Why not write for the New York Times?

Well, here’s a hint: because if you ever do, your work will be locked away in the cyber equivalent of an iron strongbox for the rest of its natural life, with only those who pay getting access to it.

I think it’s obvious, also, that if you’re not writing for posterity in some way, why be any kind of journalist in the first place?

Humour wears thin

Slim-Fast has just axed Whoopi Goldberg from its TV ads because she did what she was born to do: make jokes.

Goldberg made fun of the US president at a Democratic fundraiser at Radio City Music Hall in New York last week. “We should keep Bush where he belongs,” Goldberg said, gesturing at her genitals, “and not in the White House.”

I mean, I don’t really care that she made a wordplay joke about specifically, erm, Bush. Heh. It’s just the killjoy aspect that I find pathetic!

Tuesday, July 13, 2004

Firemen! Oooooh!

FDNY: Firefighter Billy Biel, photo copyright Alan Batt

OK, turning the campness firmly off, I just took a look around cyberspace and found something which both amuses me and irritates me, at the same time. FDNY, New York City’s Fire Department, has just published its calendar for 2005. This is a somewhat mixed thing for me, as I don't go for a lot of the ‘types’ seen therein. However there are a few nice ones, like this enchanting young man. But they’ve gone and called the damn thing Calendar of Heroes. Why, oh why? Heroes? Nope. Firefighters who risk their lives every day as part of their job and are therefore not particularly exceptional when considered alongside any other firefighter? Yes.

Let’s just hve an end to this “Oh, 9/11, they’re so brilliant, oh, oh” thing already.

Although, heh, some of them are undoubtedly damn fine. :o)

Saturday, July 10, 2004

43% of Americans didn't do it in 2002

Do what?, I hear you say. Well, the answer is… alarming. In 2002, very nearly fifty per cent of the American public didn’t even pick up a book with the intention of reading it. I found this article via MoorishGirl, and it does disturb me because I genuinely love reading proper books. But is this figure actually representative of a non–reading cadre of Americans, or does it hide those who simply spend a lot of time reading erudite and informative electronic texts?

Just to balance it all out, I've been reading (although, sadly on–screen) a very interesting Guardian Review profile of writer Peter Ackroyd who has given all us readers much pleasure – and has given London an entirely fitting tribute by writing its biography. Lucky London: it’s always too busy to write its own, and would never hope to finish the damn thing. Heh. :o)

It’s always a pleasure to read a carefully–printed and –bound book, because the typeface and paper seem to add so much to the experience if you have a certain mindset. Earlier this week, the cornerstone of what will be New York’s replacement for the World Trade Center was laid, and fittingly for the the city, the typeface chosen for the carved inscription was Gotham.

The choice of Gotham is more than a matter of typographical arcana (though as typographical arcana go, it’s not bad). As the first tangible element of the Freedom Tower — and, by extension, the trade center redevelopment — and as an image seen nationwide on Independence Day, the cornerstone sent an aesthetic signal of intent.

And staying with Ground Zero and all that it represents and has given birth to, I went to see Michael Moore’s notorious–before–it–was–released Fahrenheit 9/11 last night. Like most Moore, it’s partisan, although with so much press and public apathy in America at the moment, that is no bad thing. My dad, who has also seen it, said: “In all those clips of Bush, he’s presented as just… a fart. But there are so many of them that you just overwhelmingly know that that’s what he is: a fart.”

After having seen the thing myself, I think a few things: one, that its win at Cannes earlier this year is understandable due to the strength and urgency of the message; two, that its violently mixed reception is due to the strength of the message; and three, that the message itself is ‘trifaceted’ if there‘s such a word.

  • Message one: big business will always control the Presidency and senior politicians in today’s America.
  • Message two: this is shown by the increasing transparency of the current administration’s lies over Iraq.
  • (Aside: yesterday’s publication, by the US Senate Intelligence Committee, of its report (large PDF) on the prewar Iraq ‘intelligence’ is one more nail in the coffin of the vapid excuses peddled by big business / Bush.)

  • Message three: by lying to pretty much everybody about domestic and international terrorism and Iraq, and by being feckless in its own country as well as abroad, the Bush administration has been guilty of betraying the USA’s traditionally cautious and largely moral stance on war, which is that an army shouldn’t be asked to make the ultimate sacrifice unless it’s absolutely necessary.
  • Predictably, the reviews are all very mixed. But I think it’s compelling viewing for anyone.

    Sunday, July 04, 2004

    Poutine

    n. [poo ' teen]:

    The cheese curds did indeed melt and pull the dish together into one gooey mass, although the French fries stayed crispy enough to be individually discernible in the collective, giving the dish a pleasing light crunch. The brown gravy was turpid and dark, with a sturdy tannin structure supporting notes of oak, wood smoke, spice, aniseed and musk. There was the faintest hint of chocolate and raspberry in the finish, though that may have reflected a previous use of the serving dish. In the nose, the poutine was beefy and slightly insolent – I detected an almost wanton playfulness, the evanescent flavors frolicking together like young beavers in a Gaspé pond at dusk…

    Poutine is like the Scottish ‘Chips and Cheese’ which I enjoyed so often in Aberdeen after a night out. But this has cheese curds and gravy. And the above, comedic, superb description comes from an entry on the equally superb Idle Words. Go there at once. Now. Shoo!

    Friday, July 02, 2004

    Saddam in court: zero credibility


    Found on MetaFilter. As was this. [insanely loud laugh]

    Thursday, July 01, 2004

    High–minded vitriol

    Cover of

    It’s about time we stopped using ‘high–minded’ as a cliché and started understanding it to mean a sort of crystalline, passionate venting of the intellect. The passion has drained from op–ed journalism these days. People no longer say what they really feel, and I’m absolutely sure that many such writers consciously think about their writing *style*, rather than their *true beliefs* when they write.

    That said, and without cliché myself, I have not read any recent writing (apart, of course, from poetry) as high–minded as this article in the Village Voice by Gary Indiana:

    Despite the cornucopia of bijoux items from the crackpot right and free-range, publicity–addicted blabbermouths that publishers like HarperCollins and other multinational subsidy boutiques were touting a mere nine months ago as wonderful additions to whatever bookshelves American homes still feature as decorative touches, even the antic Ms. Coulter would have to concede—well, actually, I doubt it—that the popularity of these offerings has been remarkably transient, and most did nothing in sales next to Hillary Clinton's recent blockbuster. It seems that Americans who can still afford to buy a book, and are able to read one, prefer political books that appeal to their better natures instead of their baser instincts and favor writing that offers, at the very least, some hope that diverse people might one day live in acceptance of difference and the golden rule instead of eternal antagonism and warfare.

    Yes. He did write a single paragraph that long and use only two sentences. Grammatically he’s verbosely shite, but what the hell does that matter when what he says makes so much sense?

    (I’m not just talking about Clinton’s book now, by the way. Hehe.)

    The (genuinely funny, and heartening) thing is, this has been called a book review. I’m sure Indiana started it as one, but his passion for his wider subject just overtook it, so I present it to you as a superb example of how firecely an idealistic fire can burn, in even a journalistic breast.

    Wednesday, June 30, 2004

    Worldwide plotting

    President George W. Bush has a new policy: to start a Reign of Freedom around the world. So now we know: the invasion of Iraq wasn’t about getting their oil at all. He wanted to let freedom slither onto the gritty plains of Iraq and grow, menacingly and quietly, until it Ruled.

    Hmmm. Something doesn’t fit there. Freedom does not, and cannot, rule — or reign, as he so grandiloquently put it. That’s by definition. What a twat. (He’s even going to send into combat loads of people who have woken up for years thinking they’re retired!)

    All news seems to be old news these days, whether it’s a fight on Big Brother (our own Deputy Prime Minister punched a guy a few years ago) or a set of political memoirs (the inches pile up and still nobody’s any the wiser). But did you know that the first ever hand–printed tabloid newspapers were called broadsides? The link leads you to an online collection of them, and there are plenty of stories from the days when a murder story was to be salivated over and the type–gutters dripped with blood. And when wives were sold. I bet if you told one of those people, then, about today’s sites like EBay, they’d have clamoured for a ‘Wives’ section.

    Of course, today’s public are more libertarian: wives don’t allow themselves to be sold. They give themselves away on websites all over the world. Heh.

    Here’s a site with PDF copies of early printed books. (Including “A Booke of Secrets”. Endearingly silly – they bloody *published* them!) Also: Incoming Signals, a site so wonderfully peppered with typographical linky bullets, you’d think an ant with inky slippers had taken a walk. Stationery design – calm and beautiful and bulletless – at Passing Notes.

    The ever–popular ‘bunnies’ series continues: Titanic in 30 seconds with bunnies. And Coudal continues too: with a great redesign and a retrospective of some of its frontpage graphics. Way to go, bro. z.

    Thursday, June 24, 2004

    Important men in suits and ties, talking about torture

    This is hypnotically interesting and tainted:

    On June 22, 2004, the White House officially released 14 documents originating from the White House, the Pentagon and the Justice Department concerning the Administration’s interrogation policies [in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and against the ‘unlawful combatants’ held there].

    Here they are.

    Wednesday, June 23, 2004

    Trains in the City

    Hudson Rail Yards, New York City

    All right. It’s not Sex and the City (as I titled my University dissertation [PDF]) but I suppose if you have a fetish for metro sex, it’s one way of getting your kicks. I got the photo from the insightful, urban, lively Gothamist:

    Gothamist was struck by this photograph of the railyards the new development would replace, because there’s something beautiful about this mass of trains in the middle of the city.

    There certainly is. The convergence — or, should I say, collision? — of trains and river is superb, particularly against a river of this breadth. In your mind, they just do not belong together, and yet when you see this in a city, in the flesh, as it were, it is perfectly fitting.

    You get the effect in London somewhat, but London’s large stations don’t abut the water in the way these yards do. Waterloo station (which is currently London’s — and the UK’s — only international rail terminal) has a wide splay of tracks like this, but it isn’t as close to the aqueous and vaguely oily ripple of the Thames as it should be.

    I have fond memories of Waterloo. Particularly the little coffeeshop which used, as its interior walls, the old bare masonry of the station’s outer shell. And my early days in London, when I worked at the National Film Theatre in their Press Office, and stopped in Waterloo each morning for breakfast and contemplation. How close by everything seemed then… *sigh*

    Monday, June 21, 2004

    “Yes officer, I'm paperpete”

    Yet another reason for someone who doesn’t already live there to get worried about the thought of visiting: America’s police can now demand that you give your name to an officer who asks for it, when you’re not even suspected of anything. It’s worth noting that the House was deeply divided on the vote, and that this is only the first stage. Both points are gratifying to some extent. But it still worries the bit of me which wants to go there sometime.

    Also worth noting that my brother once drunkenly said “I haven’t had a cunt all night, Drinkstable” to a UK officer and got laughed at and told off.

    My friends Giles and Mark sat in my kitchen last night and discussed an article in this month’s issue of the Observer’s monthly music mag, called The 100 Greatest British Albums. MetaFilter has blogged it (quite surprisingly, I have to say — I just didn’t think stuff I read would pass muster with MeFites — but they’re coming to a lot of the same conclusions (or similar) that Mark and Giles arrived at: far too much ‘———’ and far too little ‘———’. Whatever floats one’s boat, I suppose!

    Also from MetaFilter: The State of the Commons (which are the range of intellectual, textual, natural, etc. resources that the American (or worldwide!!) public collectively owns, but which nasty companies try to attach rules to), How to cope with all those words you don’t quite know how to use or which you often mistake. And, if you want to go back to uni but don’t want to leave your job, or your comfy chair, just surf right along to MIT's Open CourseWare pages. It is fascinating, the range of stuff out there in cyberspace these days.

    I’m a bit pissed off to hear that Hotmail blocks all email from GMail, even invitations, because I sent a couple of people GMail invitations and they won’t have got through. Grrr! But I guess I can console myself (har har) by playing a little textual Hamlet.

    Sunday, June 20, 2004

    Impending work

    That might seem to be a strange title. After all, even though I post throughout the day, who’s to know, reading this, that I haven’t had a job for quite a long time? Well, I haven’t, and starting tomorrow, I have.

    However I’m not actually going to say here what the job is or where it is, because there’s been far too much strife going on lately vis–à–vis employees blogging about their work (or even not about their work, but just being identifiable as an employee by what they post about in general) and being fired.

    I could be working in a paint factory or something. You never know. But you won’t know (or at least shouldn’t) from what I write here. I don’t intend to mention work a whole lot, anyway.

    Right now, though, I’m having the usual ‘night before work’ blues. You know: won’t be able to stay up as late as I did, my whole day will be eaten up, I’ll have to rush things I didn’t rush before, etc. etc. etc. With any luck (and a fair amount of state generosity) I won’t run out of cash before the first paycheck comes through. With even more luck, I’ll find out I’m doing something interesting, or at least not oppressive. There are plenty of people who honestly don’t dread going into their jobs each day. I want to be one of them. There are plenty of people who actually like what they do quite a lot, in a real sense. I want to be one of them, too.

    Wish me luck.

    Thursday, June 17, 2004

    d00d, TH15 r0x0r j00r b0x0rz

    G3t y0ur PHr3Ku3N7ly H4s|{3d K0o?St330nZ 4n5w3r3d H3r3:

    “w00t”, “w007”, or “\^/007” or the smiley “\o/” is a common interjection, analogous to “Yeah!” or “Yippee!” One view is that it originated as a variant of the interjection “whew”. Another view believes that it is from hacking, when a hacker would exclaim “Root!” when he got root access. Yet another view is that it originated from an acronym for Want One Of Those. It actually got started as part of the online arena–FPS gaming community (esp. Quake) — short for “We Own the Other Team”.

    And just in case you still have no idea — why not????/ The linked article is from Wikipedia and describes ‘Leet’ in detail.

    Ulysses & Pepys

    No, not Ulysses the god. Ulysses the book – by James Joyce – is now available in daily weblog format, a page a day. (Via Foreword.) It follows on from the previously–established Pepys’ Diary (which, as well as being voyeuristic is an entirely unpretentious intro to the period in which Samuel lived.

    I swear this is real

    Courtesy of Snopes.com

    Photo courtesy of Snopes.com

    From MetaFilter: Have you heard of Fucking?

    In Austria?

    As a result of increasing attention from the media, Fucking has become more and more well–known throughout the world.

    Apparently it’s as old as the hills. Well, not quite. But still a very old place. MetaFilter also points to the Amish (ha!) town of Intercourse, in Pennsylvania, and Pussy, and Condom, in France.

    Wikipedia has a list of other unusual placenames: I particularly like Big Bone Lick (Kentucky), Bastardo (Italy), Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg (a lake in Massachusetts), Dildo (Newfoundland), Lord Hereford’s Knob (a hill in the Welsh Borders, also called Twmpa), Muff (Northern Ireland), Fok Shitt Wan Kaa (Northern Thailand), Little Shittington (in a fictional English country I made up myself), Pissing–by–the–Sea (ditto), Simmering (in Vienna, Austria), Twatt (in both the Orkney and Shetland Islands, Scotland) and finally the seemingly unpronounceable Zzyzx in California.

    Wednesday, June 16, 2004

    Hayfever

    (wakes up)

    (burning throat and burning nose running like a tap)

    (painful sneezing fits)

    (feeling of utter lethargy and slothfulness, aches in legs)

    This isn’t flu. This is hayfever, a really, really bad day, it’s just not fair. :o((( (cries)

    Monday, June 14, 2004

    Stephen Carrie Blumberg: book thief extraordinaire

    From 'Gods Becoming Men' by Olga Tobreluts

    More on the above at the end: I thought it was colourful but it wasn’t what I immediately wanted to write about here.

    I want to write about this. Grand Theft Biblio.

    It finished, years afterwards, with doorknobs. Stephen Blumberg, and his associate Steven Worden (apt, really) were found in a house — which was then in possession of a bank — having stolen a rather impressive amount of doorknobs. Blumberg’s theft of a vast amount of rare manuscripts and books from libraries across the nation was only remembered later. And he’d previously been sentenced for that, erm, offence.

    At 2 a.m. on March 20, 1990, police in the small town of Ottumwa, Iowa ended the career of a man who is arguably the world’s most notorious bibliomaniac. With his arrest that night, Stephen Carrie Blumberg said goodbye for the last time to the library he had spent twenty years amassing. In that time he had gathered books from forty–five states, the District of Columbia, and two Canadian provinces. The value of his collection has been estimated conservatively at seven million dollars. Blumberg’s library, like all good collections, had a unifying theme; every one of his 23,600 books had been stolen.

    Blumberg was allowed to continue his 1990s bookish spree because historical libraries, on discovering a theft, would not release information or co–operate with police for fear of advertising their lack of security – and for fear of ridicule.

    Blumberg stole books because he loved them. There was not a thought of selling them on — no: they were far too precious for that, and far too deserving of a caring, careful owner. He is significant, Jon Wilson writes, to anyone with an interest in understanding bibliophiles because his obsession with books grew out of an understandable passion for them. Only in his extreme and criminal actions did he cross the line from book love to book madness. In Blumberg we see the characteristics of a true bibliophile, magnified by a madness that was not original with him. Blumberg is only a recent example of a collector whose book love has turned into book madness.

    The Museum Security Network’s Book Thefts page muses:

    He takes some understanding. How does one reconcile an apparently genuine appreciation for a 1493 Nuremberg Chronicle bound in ivory calfskin and a slovenliness so pronounced that the wife of an acquaintance felt she had to Lysol the chair he had sat in whenever he stopped by? He barely finished high school. He never married. He had a long history of mental illness. He was nomadic, driving around the country in an old Cadillac or truck, stealing books, endless books, books he selected with care for his collection. But he was not above common thievery. Often, with henchmen, he would steal antiques and sell them. He came from a well-off family and had a private income of $72,000 annually, but now and then he needed extra money. He never sold his books. He said he would return them one day.

    I won’t rehearse the shadowy shenanigans to which Blumberg must have been driven in his quest to liberate these precious paper parcels from their academic slumber. It is easy — as Miles Harvey explains in his positively stellar, compulsive book The Island of Lost Maps — to remove an individual page from a rare book. Even when you are under the proboscis of a particularly hawk–eyed librarian in a million–dollar facility with security guards.

    (I have to interrupt here. You know that book reference above? The American Society of Archivists, bless it, is awfully sniffy. “Of far less relevance is Harvey’s preoccupation with his own psychological motivations for writing The Island of Lost Maps,” it positively declares. “These ruminations occur too frequently and belong in a diary and not this book.” What nonsense. The man’s infectious enthusiasm shines through and is a delight. Anyway. Book theft.) —

    It is less easy to remove an entire book. It is positively difficult to repeat this feat, again and again, until one has amassed one’s own illicit library. And yet Blumberg succeeded.

    I know I said I wouldn’t go into his methods. But I can’t help wondering: how does a man, looking like your usual library–rat, manage to order up a priceless manuscript or map from the stacks and then just disappear with it? He is obviously the living incarnation of every film noir trenchcoat that has ever… been projected.

    Present–day librarians — and not just universities — still worry:

    Not having to erase books my last few minutes, I meander over to the bulletin board. A new posting about a convicted library thief is hanging front center. The full–page warning has two photos of Stephen Carrie Blumberg, a full description of height, weight, hair color, and an account of events leading up to his jail time and recent release on probation. The All Points Bulletin sent out warnings to all libraries and bookstores to look for this felon. Blumberg was convicted in 1990 of “interstate transportation and possession of 19 tons of rare books and manuscripts valued at approximately $20,000,000. He was sentenced to 71 months imprisonment and 36 months parole” (APB, 1996). Blumberg was ordered by the courts to notify his parole officer before visiting any bookstore or library and is supposed to identify himself by name to staff at these locations. “Luckily the students at UI are not ‘professional thieves’ as this man appears to be,” I think to myself. Interrupting my daydream about the library thief, the computer lab monitor hollers at me, “That’s everybody,” as he exits the library. Whew...

    PNLA Quarterly: Pacific Northwest Library Association, 76:2 Winter ’93 [PDF].

    Plucky librarians, and The Law, do have some recourse to safeguards, however. In 1996, our tender, bookloving Stephen was required by a Judge to identify himself on entering any library or bookstore. In the UK ths order would be important because it is hardly ever imposed — except on juveniles who have repeatedly robbed a shop, or on paedophiles who have frequented a neighbourhood. The fact that the innocents at risk are books and the predator a bibliophile kleptomaniac shows the depth of concern to which a Judgely breast may be stirred in the States.

    And here are some more interesting things: More stealing, this time of subway trains. More maps – this time by artistsMillbank Pier in London… Travel (of a kind, actually standing still) at airports… and more travel (except this time underground, in the city of New Yorkan index of –ians and –ites from The Morning NewsGods Becoming Men: Olympic figures in Athens this summer… that’s about it for now.

    Bless this house

    Pollen Grain: image (c) U. of Arizona

    It’s warmer outdoors than it is indoors today. It was the same yesterday also, courtesy of a stone–tiled hallway and kitchen downstairs. I can’t think of another reason, anyway — my window is petulantly and firmly closed as the pollen is annoying me too much, and I’m sitting here and pretending not to notice as it gusts up at the panes invisibly and tries to get my attention. If it keeps this up, I may complain to its clematis.

    Gigantic caught my attention (because of its name, and secondarily because of this jaunty post on blog redesign) via Gapers’ Block (which has a list of summer reading including several titles that had me nodding in encouragement), via Link Worthy (which contains link after link and a linky blog buried somewhere inside, too).

    And now I can’t remember what I was going to write about in the first place, so I’m off for some green tea.

    Thursday, June 10, 2004

    The old man said something special…

    …when he left the White House for the last time. His farewell speech to the US, given on a midwinter night in 1999, and which I’ve just watched for the first time, was delivered with an almost grandfatherly benevolence. And in it:

    Ours was the first revolution in the history of mankind that truly reversed the course of government, and with three little words: “We the people.” “We the people” tell the government what to do, it doesn’t tell us. “We the people” are the driver, the government is the car. And we decide where it should go, and by what route, and how fast. Almost all the world’s constitutions are documents in which governments tell the people what their privileges are. Our Constitution is a document in which “We the people” tell the government what it is allowed to do. “We the people” are free.

    And let me offer lesson No. 1 about America: All great change in America begins at the dinner table. So, tomorrow night in the kitchen I hope the talking begins. And children, if your parents haven’t been teaching you what it means to be an American, let ’em know and nail ’em on it. That would be a very American thing to do.

    That speech (the transcript is here) certainly shows what newfound eloquence can come from having an ‘Old Hollywood’ actor in a political job: I suspect that Reagan knew before he started that his job would be just as much about acting as it was about politics. However, in this speech there’s something more.

    This speech isn’t a promise of what he’ll do. It’s his last speech; he can do nothing more as President. This speech isn’t a monolithic account, handed to History, of what he’s achieved. It is instead, as I’ve said above, a fond eulogy, high on emotion and low on detail, to his time spent changing things. A grandfather talking to his grownup grandchildren, his eyes sparkling and his lips poised in a grin, occasionally pursing more than slightly, as older mouths seem apt to do.

    And what do you think? How do you want things? Never mind ‘America’ — I’m interested in what I’ve done, and I hope you’ll feel it was worth it. If you don’t, then speak, and don’t stop until you’ve got what you want.

    He seems to be saying all that. Of course, he’s a politician. That is his skill. He is an actor. That is his vocation. And he is a Republican, with those values. But I sense a world of difference between his ‘less government’ ideal and Bush’s ‘more government’ soapbox.

    Lassoed by a politician with an actor’s guile? Probably. But I yearn for the day when Bush, or anyone like him, says anything remotely like that and means it.

    Reagan Lies in State

    Reagan lying in state: Capitol Rotunda - Copyright Stephen Crowley, New York Times

    And Bush lies in the White House. Cough.

    Well, I guess something like this just had to happen, didn’t it?

    Capitol police officers, shouting “Airborne threat, four minutes out!” ordered an evacuation as loud alarms sounded, and dozens of dignitaries and former Reagan aides gathered in a reception room near the Senate floor went running down the north steps of the Senate wing.

    That’s a quote from the New York Times’ story on President Reagan’s lying–in–state at the Capitol in Washington. State? Hmmm, not for the first few minutes anyway.

    Jonathan blogs the former President’s death and the resulting media *cough* obsequies *cough* here, more knowledgeably than most Brits could, because he’s not a Brit:

    Ronald Reagan is dead. Can you believe it? What do you mean, of course, you silly twit? Haven’t you seen the impassioned media coverage of this sudden news? And the plans for the biggest funeral America has seen in 30 years?

    Dad and I talked about it. I said ‘Didn’t he start off as a Democrat?’ and Dad said ‘I don’t know, but it doesn’t make any difference. There’s very little space between them’. To which I replied something like ‘Well, they do have a liberal electorate there – small enough not to make a blind bit of difference’.

    Anyway, I’m certain loads of Americans are distraught over this. It’s a big thing for them. But even if I *was* American, I’m not sure I’d care that much even then.

    Tuesday, June 08, 2004

    When you next go to the US…

    …try to make sure it’s in about twenty years or so. By then, hopefully most of the Orwellian laws which currently sit astride your personal freedoms will have disappeared.

    A British journalist, Elena Lappin, was strip–searched and imprisoned for more than 24 hours before being deported — for, as MetaFilter puts it, ‘the crime of not knowing about a never enforced 1952 law requiring “special” journalist visas’. A few grabs from her story, which was the first link above:

    The Patriot Act, introduced 45 days after 9/11, contains a chapter on Protecting The Border […] One of its innovations was to revive a law that had been dormant since 1952, requiring journalists to apply for a special visa, known as I–visa, when visiting the US for professional reasons.

    “You came here as a journalist, and you don’t have a journalist’s visa.” I had never heard of it. […] I requested a glass of water, which the interrogating officer brought me himself. He was a gentle, intelligent interrogator: the interview lasted several hours and consisted of a complete appraisal of my life, past and present, personal and professional. He needed information as diverse as my parents’ names, the fee I would be paid for the article I was working on […]

    “How dare you treat an American officer with disrespect?” he shouted back, indignantly. “Believe me, we have treated you with much more respect than other people. You should go to places like Iran, you’d see a big difference.” The irony is that it is only “countries like Iran” (for example, Cuba, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Zimbabwe) that have a visa requirement for journalists. It is unheard of in open societies, and, in spite of now being enforced in the US, is still so obscure that most journalists are not familiar with it. Thirteen foreign journalists were detained and deported from the US last year, 12 of them from LAX.

    This poor woman wasn’t simply told she couldn’t stay and put on the next flight home. She was caught up in a web of officialdom (increasingly applied to peaceful journalists in the US) which chose to flaunt its power for no other reason than…

    Than what? I honestly don’t know what to write to finish that sentence. It baffles me. Transport security? Is that being handled well? Is that why they show so much… caution? Not on your life. Is it to combat terrorism? The National Post doesn’t seem to think so.

    Oh, hang on, I know! Under current rules, yes, rules which apply to everyone (apart from bad nations – the UK is officially counted as Good) entering the US, you can enter ‘for business or pleasure’ without a visa for a few months. That rule suddenly doesn’t apply to journalists — lying deceitful harmful terrorist scumbags that they are.

    I want a reason for that distinction. I want Colin Powell or Tom Ridge to stand up in front of the Press, and the foreign citizens the Press exists to serve, in a fortnight’s time, and give a goddamn fucking REASON. (Although an apology and a withdrawal of these absurdities as quick as possible would be the decent thing to do, really, wouldn’t it?)

    Monday, June 07, 2004

    Spy on your MP – See photos – Take Photos

    TheyWorkForYou is a new beta site which is maintained by a group of guys who say, in their intro to the site: “We are a dozen or so volunteers who think it should be really easy for people to keep tabs on their elected MP, and comment on what goes on in Parliament.”

    It contains a way for you to search Hansard (the UK Parliamentary Record) easily and have your results presented as individual speeches. This feature currently goes back only as far as 2001. But the amazing thing is that you can type your postcode, see who your MP is, see their biography, their voting record, how often they’ve actually been in the House… very useful for some people, and very interesting for me.

    A MetaFilter thread linking to excellent, high–resolution AP photos, and high–resolution photos of D–Day. (May disappear soon.)

    Another MetaFilter thread containing a moderate flamewar — arising from signs that Bush’s White House may be slowly imploding. Hopeful news if ever I heard any!

    And finally: although London’s underground travellers haven’t had the right to take photos on the Tube for some time, New York’s citizens are facing their first such ban. And they’re protesting, as Gothamist reports and Unrelated News shows.

    Man gets pissed off, demolishes town

    Police move in to arrest the dead man

    If this wasn’t so obviously devastating to the town concerned, it’d be absolutely hilarious. Oh, wait: it is absolutely hilarious! :o)

    GRANBY, COLORADO — Friends said Marvin Heemeyer hadn’t been seen much lately, and now they know why: he was turning a bulldozer into an armor–plated vehicle.

    A vehicle weighing 53 tons and encased in foot–thick reinforced plating, to be exact.

    He’d got pissed off about his business taking a turn for the worse, had feuds going with quite a few people in the little town. And then the last straw: this builder (don’t mess with builders!) had a snowmobile (pretty essential in that town, I gather) and it broke down.

    And what happened? He’s dead. The police found him like that, inside his vehicle with his stash of guns.

    It only took them about nine hours to open the door.

    Sunday, June 06, 2004

    World War Two ~ War on Terror? What bollocks

    I left a comment on this (previously referenced) thread on Dean’s World a while back, and more recently posted the comment below. I’m posting it here because, well, I think it matters enough to say it here too.

    There was a victory of patriotism over partisanship [in World War Two]. I’d be inclined to emphasise the monumentally extreme nature of the Nazi threat to the allies collectively a little more, and individual patriotism a little less, however, but that’s a moot point.

    However, if (as I suspect) this discussion also attempts to draw a few sneaky parallels between the War on Terror and World War II and the rightness / worldwide agreement / worldwide fear / political acceptability / imperative of truly historic proportions thereof, those parallels will fail.

    I say this with my mind concentrated on the goods and evils of World War II and not on those of the War on Terror: these two conflicts are not comparable. No succour for the present war, or for any other war, can be drawn from the specific and horrible threats the Allies faced in the 30s and 40s.

    I say the above after having also spent more or less an entire half–year reading various books about WWII. I, like everyone here, am living through the current war. Right or wrong completely aside, I simply don’t sense that we are living through a period which ‘matters’ as much as that one did. Or (the usual naysayers you get in every war aside) that we are in a war agreed upon by as many people worldwide as those who agreed at the time about the absolute necessity of overcoming the Nazis back then.

    These are just two completely different wars. Mixing them up with comparisons will be done. Colleagues of mine will be among the guilty parties. I just don’t feel it would serve a purpose, I don’t think it would work — I just don’t think parallels can be drawn between the two. Enough said.

    Well, maybe not quite enough said. Over at Dean’s World, even though I despise a lot of the politics there, the discussion on this topic is decent, as you habitually find there, and circumspect. But if I hear of a single proponent of the “War on Terror” directly trying to milk World War Two of some sort of support for their agenda, I’ll want to rip the insensitive f———er limb from limb.